Prediction of LC-MS/MS Properties of Peptides from Sequence by Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning models for prediction of three key LC-MS/MS properties from peptide sequences were developed. The LC-MS/MS properties or behaviors are indexed retention times (iRT), MS1 or survey scan charge state distributions, and sequence ion intensities of HCD spectra. A common core deep supervised learning architecture, bidirectional long-short term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks was used to construct the three prediction models. Two featurization schemes were proposed and demonstrated to allow for efficient encoding of modifications. The iRT and charge state distribution models were trained with on order of 10 5 data points each. An HCD sequence ion prediction model was trained with 2 × 10 6 experimental spectra. The iRT prediction model and HCD sequence ion prediction model provide improved accuracies over the start-of-the-art models available in literature. The MS1 charge state distribution prediction model offers excellent performance. The prediction models can be used to enhance peptide identification and quantification in data-dependent acquisition and data-independent acquisition (DIA) experiments as well as to assist MRM (multiple reaction monitoring) and PRM (parallel reaction monitoring) experiment design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".