Compliance with Recommended Practices for Management of Controlled Substances in a Health Care Facility and Corrective Actions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACTBackground: Pharmacists are required to maintain a secure inventory of medications and to ensure proper, safe, and diversion-free dispensing practices. Objectives: The primary objectives of this study were to determine compliance with recommended practices for the management of controlled substances in a mother–child teaching hospital and to identify actions to improve compliance. The secondary objective was to identify steps in the drug pathway for controlled substances and associated failure modes in the study hospital.Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study used a framework devel-oped by the California Hospital Association (CHA) to assess compliance with recommended practices for the management of controlled substances in hospitals. For each criterion, a research assistant observed practices within the pharmacy, on patient care units, at outpatient care clinics, and in operating and delivery rooms. The level of compliance was recorded as compliant, partially compliant, or noncompliant. An Ishikawa diagram was developed to illustrate steps in the drug pathway and associated failure modes related to the use of controlled substances in the study hospital. Results: The pathway for controlled substances at the study hospital was compliant for 56 (49.6%) of the 113 CHA criteria, partially compliant for 27 (23.9%) of the criteria, and noncompliant for 24 (21.2%) of the criteria; the remaining 6 (5.3%) criteria were not applicable. This practice evaluation highlighted 22 corrective actions, 12 (55%) that could be implemented in the short term, 8 (36%) suitable for implementation in the medium term, and 2 (9%) suitable for both the short and medium term. A total of 57 potential failure modes related to the use of controlled substances were identified.Conclusions: The pathway for controlled substances at the study hospital was compliant with almost half of the CHA criteria, and 22 corrective actions were identified. Pharmacists, physicians, and nurses should be mobilized to optimize the use of controlled substances throughout the drug-use process.RÉSUMÉContexte: Les pharmaciens sont responsables de maintenir à jour les réserves de médicaments et doivent faire en sorte que les pratiques de distribution soient adéquates, sûres et exemptes de détournement. Objectifs : Les objectifs principaux de la présente étude consistaient à déterminer le degré de conformité aux pratiques de gestion des substances contrôlées, recommandées dans un hôpital universitaire mère-enfant, et de trouver des mesures pour améliorer leur degré de conformité. L’objectif secondaire visait à recenser les étapes que suivent les substances contrôlées dans le circuit des médicaments et les modes de défaillance qui y sont associés dans l’hôpital à l’étude.Méthodes : La présente étude descriptive et transversale s’appuyait sur un cadre mis au point par la California Hospital Association (CHA), qui sert à évaluer le degré de conformité aux recommandations relatives aux pratiques de gestion des substances contrôlées dans les hôpitaux. Pour chaque critère, un assistant de recherche observait les pratiques dans le service de pharmacie, les unités de soins, les cliniques de consultation ex-terne et les salles d’opération ou les salles d’accouchement. Il évaluait le degré de conformité à l’aide d’un des qualificatifs suivants : conforme, partiellement conforme ou non conforme. Un diagramme d’Ishikawa a été conçu pour illustrer les étapes du circuit des médicaments et les modes de défaillance associés à l’utilisation de substances contrôlées dans l’hôpital à l’étude. Résultats : Le circuit des substances contrôlées à l’hôpital où se déroulait l’étude était conforme à 56 (49,6 %) des 113 critères de la CHA, partiellement conforme à 27 (23,9 %) critères et non conforme à 24 (21,2 %) critères; les 6 (5,3 %) critères restants n’étaient pas applicables. Cette évaluation des pratiques a mis en évidence 22 actions correctives, dont 12 (55 %) pouvaient être mises en place à court terme, 8 (36 %) à moyen terme et 2 (9 %) à court ou à moyen terme. Les investigateurs ont repéré 57 modes de défaillance potentiels liés à l’utilisation de substances contrôlées.Conclusions : L’analyse du circuit des substances contrôlées à l’hôpital où se déroulait l’étude a révélé que près de la moitié des critères de la CHA étaient conformes, et 22 actions correctives ont été proposées. Les pharmaciens, médecins et infirmières devraient participer à l’optimisation de l’utilisation des substances contrôlées dans l’ensemble du processus de distribution des médicaments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.056 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".