MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955221489 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v8i2.555

Grey Platelet Syndrome and Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review

2019· article· en· W2955221489 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Francisco Ibargüengoitia-Ochoa, Cintia María Sepúlveda-Rivera, Sergio Emmanuel Santoyo-Rosas, Diego Arturo Gonzalez-Vazquez, Jessica Aidée Mora-Galván, Samuel Vargas-Trujillo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePlateletGestationPregnancyObstetricsAnesthesiologyHematologyInternal medicineAnesthesiaPediatricsGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grey platelet syndrome is an uncommon hereditary platelet disorder, and is characterized by thrombocytopenia and platelet dysfunction with a specific absence of alpha-granules. Electronic microscopy is a quick test that can confirm the diagnosis. We present perinatal results of a patient with diagnosed grey platelet syndrome. We reviewed the case of a patient with grey platelet syndrome at Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia. She is 26 years old, with 21 weeks’ gestation. It is noted in initial laboratories a platelet amount of 64,000/mm 3 , and grey platelet syndrome is suspected, so peripheral blood smear is carried out which showed pale platelets, and electronic microscopy was performed to confirm the disorder, which showed the absence of platelet alpha-granules. A female newborn was delivered at 38.4 week of gestation by abdominal cesarean section, weighing 2,588 g, with platelet count at birth of 119,000/mm 3 . There is no general consensus of treatment in patients with grey platelet syndrome, and management must be multi-disciplinary between obstetrics, hematology and anesthesiology services. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2019;8(2):54-56 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo555

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisFrench-language works237,207