MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955255601 · doi:10.5539/jas.v11n10p112

Role of Salicylic Acid in Alleviating Cobalt Toxicity in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seedlings

2019· article· en· W2955255601 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hala Ezzat Mohamed, Atiat Hassan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAPXSalicylic acidAntioxidantChemistryPhotosynthesisCobaltAgronomyToxicityShootBiomass (ecology)HorticultureBiologyCatalaseBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heavy metals pollution of soils become the most serious environmental problem resulted in decreased soil fertility and crop yield losses. Cobalt (Co), as a beneficial element, can be a contaminant in soils due to agricultural additives or metal refineries, it causes irreversible damage to several physiological and metabolic constituents at higher concentrations. In this investigation we study the effects of different Co concentrations (0, 50,150, 250, 350 µM as CoCl2) on growth and physiological processes in wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants and discuss the role of spraying with salicylic acid (0.5 mM) for ameliorating effect of cobalt toxicity in wheat leaves. Cobalt causing a significant reduction in fresh and dry biomass, shoot height, water content and total photosynthetic pigments. This was accompanied with accumulation of H2O2 and MDA contents and induction of some antioxidant enzymes activities. There was an increase in SOD activity with increasing Co concentration then decline, a significant increase in APX and PPO activities while CAT was significantly declined. Spraying wheat seedlings with salicylic acid can be recognized to significantly increase in all tested growth parameters and that was attributed to decrease, to some extent, the accumulation of H2O2 and MDA and improve the activity of antioxidant enzymes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicPlant Stress Responses and ToleranceFrench-language works237,207