MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955262879 · doi:10.1002/mus.26617

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Origins traced to impaired balance between neural excitation and inhibition in the neonatal period

2019· review· en· W2955262879 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew C. Kiernan, Ulf Ziemann, Andrew Eisen

Bibliographic record

VenueMuscle & Nerve · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisNeuroscienceExcitotoxicityNeurodegenerationInhibitory postsynaptic potentialMedicineDiseaseProdromeExcitatory postsynaptic potentialPsychologyPathologyGlutamate receptorInternal medicinePsychiatryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult onset disease but with an increasingly recognized preclinical prodrome. A wide spectrum of investigative approaches has identified loss of inhibitory function at the heart of ALS. In developing an explanation for the onset of ALS, it remains a consideration that ALS has its origins in neonatal derangement of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic system, with delayed conversion from excitatory to mature inhibitory GABA and impaired excitation/inhibition balance. If this is so, the resulting chronic excitotoxicity could marginalize cortical network functioning very early in life, laying the path for neurodegeneration. The possibility that adult-onset neurodegenerative conditions might have their roots in early developmental derangements is worthy of consideration, particularly in relation to current models of disease pathogenesis. Unraveling the very early molecular events will be crucial in developing a better understanding of ALS and other adult neurodegenerative disorders. Muscle Nerve, 2019.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMuscle & NerveSame topicAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchFrench-language works237,207