MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physical Literacy Competency Among Elementary and Middle School Children

2019· article· en· W2955273141 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lindsay J. DiStefano, Emma F. Zuk, Eleanor M. Beltz, Julie P. Burland, Zachary Malone, Shauna Bolton, Hayley J. Root

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiteracyConfidence intervalDemographyPhysical therapyPsychologyAnalysis of varianceMultivariate analysis of varianceMedicineGerontologyMathematicsPedagogyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical literacy addresses the ability, confidence and desire needed to optimize physical activity participation. Ability to perform, or competency in, fundamental movement skills, has not been recently evaluated among children in the United States, which is essential for identifying needs for intervention. PURPOSE: To compare physical literacy competency between sexes and age groups in children. METHODS: 288 children (134 males, 153 females; age 9±2 years; height 132±36 cm; mass 41±14 kg) from 6 schools volunteered to participate. Participants completed tasks in a randomized order to assess five domains of physical literacy competency: locomotor, running, balance, upper extremity (UE) and lower extremity (LE) object control. Trained raters evaluated competency using a standardized, valid and reliable assessment (PLAYfun; Canadian Sport for Life). Participants were divided into age groups (Elementary: grades K-4; Middle: grades 5-8). Competency on all tasks was measured using a 0-100 continuous scale. Total average score and domain average scores were compared between sexes and age groups using a multivariate analysis of variance (α<.05). RESULTS: There were no significant interactions between sexes and age groups (p>.05). Regardless of age, males demonstrated greater competency than females for overall score (mean±SE points: males=71.5±1.0, females=63.7±1.0; p<.001), running (males=75.4±1.8, females=63.72±1.80; p<.001), UE object control (males=73.32±1.71, females=56.4±1.7; p<.001), and LE object control (males=66.9±2.0, females=52.3±2.0; p<.001). Regardless of sex, Middle had greater competency than Elementary for overall score (Middle=62.2±1.0, Elementary=73.0±0.9; p<.001), locomotor (Middle=75.3±1.17, Elementary=65.0±1.3; p<.001), balance (Middle=77.4±1.3, Elementary=62.1±1.3; p<.001), UE object control (Middle=70.0±1.6, Elementary=59.8±1.8; p<.001), and LE object control (Middle=67.9±1.9, Elementary=51.2±1.8; p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences in physical literacy are present among children in the United States, especially in tasks involving object control. Similarly, over 20% of children in middle school lack competency in object control tasks. These areas need to be addressed in order to optimize long-term physical activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207