MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955337952 · doi:10.82308/24485

Testing and analysis of light gauge steel frame 9 mm OSB wood panel shear walls

2006· article· en· W2955337952 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Caroline Blais

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsShear wallStructural engineeringDuctility (Earth science)Seismic analysisStiffnessShear (geology)EngineeringOriented strand boardSteel plate shear wallMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialCreep

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of light steel gauge framed walls in the residential and commercial sector is increasing in popularity. However, our knowledge of the performance and the behaviour of structures using such walls when subjected to lateral wind and seismic loads is limited. At present, no design method for light gauge steel shear walls is contained in Canadian codes or standards. For this reason a research project on steel frame/wood panel shear walls was undertaken. A comprehensive database of monotonic and reversed cyclic tests on steel frame/wood panel shear walls is needed to obtain different wall parameters for use in design. For this particular project 1220 x 2440 mm walls (3 wall configurations for a total of 18 specimens) composed of 1.09 mm thick 230 MPa grade steel and 9.0 mm thick OSB were tested; where the screw spacing along the perimeter of the wall was varied (75, 100 & 152 mm). The equivalent energy elastic-plastic (EEEP) analysis approach was employed to derive design values from the test results; such as stiffness, strength and a resistance factor for use with the 2005 NBCC, as well as ductility and overstrength modification factors. The resistance factor, o = 0.7, determined by Branston was confirmed. Ductility related, Rd = 2.5, and overstrength related, R0 = 1.8, seismic force modification factors are recommended for use with shear wall design values that are based on the EEEP analysis approach. Furthermore, the test data were used to create and calibrate hysteretic models, with the Stewart element, which later were used in non-linear time history dynamic analyses. The Ruaumoko software was made use of for the modeling of two representative buildings with ten earthquake records for the Vancouver BC region. The shear wall system of a typical two-storey house and a three-storey commercial building was first designed for lateral loads and then modeled. The resulting shear deformations (rotations) obtained from the analyses were compared with the limiting parameters measured during the physical shear wall tests. It was found that the scaled ground motions caused a shear demand that did not exceed the test based deformation limits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.443
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207