MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955350141 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-1292

Abstract 1292: A new generation of N-terminal domain androgen receptor inhibitors, with improved pharmaceutical properties, in castration-resistant prostate cancer models

2019· article· en· W2955350141 on OpenAlexaff
Ronan Le Moigne, Nasrin R. Mawji, Carmen A. Bañuelos, Jun Wang, Kunzhong Jian, Raymond J. Andersen, Marianne D. Sadar, Han-Jie Zhou, Peter Virsik

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrogen receptorProstate cancerADMEIn vivoAndrogenPotencyChemistryPharmacologyDihydrotestosteroneCancer researchCancerIn vitroPharmacokineticsBiologyMedicineInternal medicineBiochemistryHormoneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The androgen receptor (AR) pathway continues to drive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) even in late stages of the disease, and ligand binding domain (LBD)-linked resistance inevitably emerges. Selective inhibition of the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the AR can inhibit its’ transcription even in the presence of anti-androgen resistance. A Phase I clinical trial of the first-generation AR NTD inhibitor, EPI-506 (EPI-002 pro-drug), demonstrated PSA declines in anti-androgen resistant metastatic CRPC patients. However, these declines were minor and of short duration, revealing the need for more potent and metabolically stable NTD inhibitors. A new generation of NTD transcriptional inhibitors (Anitens) has been generated. Examples of this new class, EPI-7170 and EPI-7245, demonstrate improved potency, metabolic stability and pharmaceutical properties, and are potent against anti-androgen resistant prostate cancers in in vitro and in preclinical models. Methods: Chemical structure activity relationships were developed to identify more potent molecules as measured by both cellular and in vivo assays, while metabolic stability improvements were assessed in in vitro ADME assays and in animal pharmacokinetic studies. In addition, the on-target activity and selectivity were also optimized using a variety of cellular experiments. Results: These next generation Anitens demonstrated a 10-20-fold improvement on AR-driven cellular potency, with IC50’s of 0.5-1 uM compared to 10 uM for EPI-002. Aniten AR inhibition was specific to the NTD, as demonstrated by the absence of LBD binding and the inhibition of the AR-V7-driven transcription inLNCaP95 model. In vitro proliferation assays demonstrated AR-dependent activity, with an IC50 ~ 1 uM in LNCaP and >10 uM in the AR-independent cell model PC-3. The antiproliferative effect aligned with the inhibitory effect on a subset of AR-driven genes. In vivo, next generation Anitens demonstrated PSA serum decreases along with significant tumor growth inhibition in mice bearing LNCaP tumors. While EPI-7170 represents a major advance, subsequent chemistry efforts led to the generation of EPI-7245 and other next generation Anitens which exhibit IC50’s <500 nM. These new compounds exhibited favorable ADME and PK profiles, with half-life ~ 8 hrs in mice, and predicted low human clearance. Conclusions: Promising next-generation Aniten compounds have been identified which retain the NTD specificity of first-generation agents. These new molecules demonstrate major improvements in potency and metabolic stability in comparison to the first-generation clinical compound EPI-002. These next generation Anitens, by selectively inhibiting AR transcription in both hormone sensitive and castrated resistant prostate cancer, represent an important next step in AR targeted therapeutics. Citation Format: Ronan Le Moigne, Nasrin R. Mawji, C. Adriana Banuelos, Jun Wang, Kunzhong Jian, Raymond J. Andersen, Marianne D. Sadar, Han-Jie Zhou, Peter Virsik. A new generation of N-terminal domain androgen receptor inhibitors, with improved pharmaceutical properties, in castration-resistant prostate cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1292.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207