MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955367426 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-967

Abstract 967: Single-cell transcriptomics uncovers clonal heterogeneity linked to drug response and cellular phenotype in adult brain tumor stem cells

2019· article· en· W2955367426 on OpenAlexaff
Laura M. Richards, Owen Whitley, Florence M.G. Cavalli, Zhaleh Safikhani, Fiona J. Coutinho, H. Artee Luchman, Benjamin Haibe‐Kains, Samuel Weiss, Peter B. Dirks, Gary D. Bader, Trevor J. Pugh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkSickKids FoundationPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyStem cellTranscriptomePopulationCancer researchPhenotypeCancer stem cellGeneticsGene expressionGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Brain tumours remain a largely incurable disease, with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) representing the predominant form of malignancy. GBMs contain a rare population of cells, termed brain tumour stem cells (BTSCs) that drive tumour growth and disease relapse. BTSCs can be isolated and expanded in culture from primary GBMs and retain self-renewal and proliferative capacity in vitro. However, the functional diversity within the BTSC fraction, as well as relationship to the tumour bulk remains unknown. To investigate genotypic and phenotypic states within the stem-like compartment of GBM, we profiled 54,442 patient-derived BTSCs isolated from 25 GBMs using single cell RNA-sequencing (10X Genomics Chromium). Within each BTSC population, we observed diverse transcriptional clonotypes ranging from 1-7 subpopulations per sample. BTSCs grown as adherent monolayers displayed greater heterogeneity (median 4 clusters, range 2-7) compared to sphere-based cultures (median 2 clusters, range 1-3). Across samples, clusters were commonly associated with cell cycling, glial cell development and DNA replication pathways. Within multiple BTSC cultures, we identified transcriptional subclones with variable stemness properties, such as expression of ASCL1, suggesting a hierarchy of differentiation within the tumor-initiating fraction of GBM. Additionally, inference of CNVs from scRNA-seq data revealed subclonal somatic CNVs within BTSCs correspond to distinct transcriptional clonotypes that may partially explain stemness phenotypes and the formation of subpopulations during culture. To nominate targeted and combination therapies against BTSC populations in GBM, we next mapped transcriptomic features of BTSC subpopulations to high-throughput drug-screening data from central nervous system cell lines aggregated by the PharmacoDB platform.This approach nominated FDA-approved therapies that may be effective against subpopulations within each BTSC culture. In some cases, subpopulations were predicted to be sensitive to different drugs, opening a path for testing combination therapies nominated from single cell RNA-seq in vitro. Overall, these data illustrate the extent to which BTSC cultures functionally recapitulate the stem fraction in bulk primary tumours, as well as define networks of self-renewal, therapeutic resistance and targetable vulnerabilities in glioblastoma. Ongoing efforts include single nuclei RNA-seq of primary GBM tumours to enable comparison of transcriptional programs of BTSC cultures with cellular populations found in primary tissues. Citation Format: Laura M. Richards, Owen Whitley, Florence M. Cavalli, Zhaleh Safikhani, Fiona Coutinho, H. Artee Luchman, Benjamin Haibe-Kains, Samuel Weiss, Peter Dirks, Gary Bader, Trevor J. Pugh. Single-cell transcriptomics uncovers clonal heterogeneity linked to drug response and cellular phenotype in adult brain tumor stem cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 967.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207