MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955373025 · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34438

Use of tendon to produce decellularized sheets of mineralized collagen fibrils for bone tissue repair and regeneration

2019· article· en· W2955373025 on OpenAlexafffund
Brendan H. Grue, Samuel P. Veres

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversitySaint Mary's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNova Scotia Health Research Foundation
KeywordsDecellularizationMaterials scienceMineralization (soil science)Biomedical engineeringTissue engineeringBiomineralizationBone tissueFourier transform infrared spectroscopyFibrilScaffoldTransmission electron microscopyScanning electron microscopeChemical engineeringComposite materialNanotechnologyChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With demand for alternatives to autograft and allograft materials continuing to rise, development of new scaffolds for bone tissue repair and regeneration remains of significant interest. Engineered collagen-calcium phosphate (CaP) constructs can offer desirable attributes, including absence of foreign body response and possession of inherent osteogenic potential. Despite their promise, current collagen-CaP constructs are limited to nonload-bearing applications. In this article, we describe a process for creating decellularized sheets of highly aligned, natively cross-linked, and mineralized collagen fibrils, which may be useful for developing multilaminate collagen-CaP constructs with improved mechanical properties. Decellularized bovine tendons were cryosectioned to produce thin sheets of aligned collagen fibrils. Mineralization of the sheets was then performed using an alternate soaking method incorporating a polymer-induced liquid precursor (PILP) process to promote intrafibrillar mineralization, along with incorporation of physiologically relevant amounts of citrate, Mg, and carbonate. Characteristics of the produced scaffolds were assessed using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Scaffolds were also compared with both native bovine cortical bone and pure hydroxyapatite using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy attenuated total reflection (FTIR-ATR). Structural and chemical analyses show that the scaffold preparation process that we described is successful in creating mineralized collagen sheets, possessing a mineral phase similar to that found in bone as well as a close association between collagen fibrils and mineral plates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied BiomaterialsSame topicBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsFrench-language works237,207