Memorialization of the Spiritual Achievement of Confessors and New Martyrs of the Russian Orthodox Church of the twentieth century
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article reveals the features of the process of perpetuating the memory of the canonized in the last quarter of the century Holy ascetics, new martyrs and Confessors. The glorifi cation of almost two thousand saints demanded from the Church and the laity a lot of work related to the disclosure of the meaningfulness of the feats, the study of archival materials and printed sources. The fi rst step on the path of memorialization were painted icons and lives. Hagiographic work of researchers contributed to the writing of monographic research, articles, artistic and artistic-journalistic works, publication of collections of documents, memoirs, epistolary and other materials. The article states that at the present stage of development of society the Russian Orthodox Church continues to preserve and increase the ancient traditions associated with the glorifi cation of the spiritual feat of our people. This is expressed primarily in the construction of churches and chapels dedicated to those saints who remained faithful to Christ and his Church in the terrible years of persecution. The tradition of the installation of monuments and sculptural compositions to the ascetics of piety, which was established in Russia only in the XVIII century, is also actively developing. The awards established by the Church play an important role in revealing the signifi cance of the feat of the new martyrs. The article emphasized that the special role play memorial museums and memorial exhibitions in the composition of the regional, historical and art-historical museums. The article gives examples of complex work on perpetuating the memory of the new martyrs and Confessors of Russia — Grand Duchess Elizaveta Feodorovna, Hieromartyr Constantine Bogorodsky and holy hierarch Agafangel, abuna Yaroslavsky and Rostovsky.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".