Palatability of Water Organisms for Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Cichlidae)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The palatability of six species of aquatic animals and five species of plants for the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus was evaluated. Aqueous extracts of most organisms (ten of 11 species) have an attractive taste, which corresponds to euryphagia and nutritional plasticity of the Nile tilapia. Despite phytophagia, the palatability of an animal extract is higher than that of plants. The low stimulating effect of the extract of the duckweed Lemna minor suggests the presence of natural taste deterrents in it. The extract of the Canadian waterweed Elodea canadensis, depending on the origin of the plant, either completely blocks consumption or has inert taste properties. Different parts of the water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes (leaves, roots) have a similar palatability. Repeated grasps manifested during orosensory testing of food are not typical for feeding behavior of the Nile tilapia. The results of the study indicate the ability of fish to subtly differentiate food organisms according to their taste qualities and emphasize the important role of taste reception in the choice of food objects by fish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it