MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2955691720 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-3647

Abstract 3647: Single cell RNA sequencing reveals mitogenic and progenitor gene programs inBRAF-rearranged pilocytic astrocytomas

2019· article· en· W2955691720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zachary J. Reitman, Brenton R. Paolella, Guillaume Bergthold, Kristine Pelton, Robert E. Jones, Sarah Becker, Claire Sinai, Haley Malkin, Ying Huang, Leslie Grimmett, Zachary T. Herbert, Yu Sun, Jessica L. Weatherbee, John A. Alberta, John Daley, Orit Rozenblatt–Rosen, Rosalind A. Segal, Daphne A. Haas‐Kogan, Mariella G. Filbin, Mario L. Suvà, Aviv Regev, Charles D. Stiles, Mark W. Kieran, Liliana Goumnerova, Keith L. Ligon, Alex K. Shalek, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, Rameen Beroukhim

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgenitor cellPilocytic astrocytomaCancer researchIn situ hybridizationAstrocytomaGliomaBiologyRNABrain tumorMolecular biologyGene expressionFusion geneProgenitorGeneStem cellPathologyMedicineCell biologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) has been performed across a range of intermediate to high-grade gliomas that each harbor multiple driver mutations. Pilocytic astrocytoma (PA), the most common childhood brain tumor, is a low-grade glioma. PAs frequently harbor oncogenic KIAA1549-BRAF fusions, and exhibit low rates of other driver mutations. While PAs exhibit a favorable prognosis compared to the higher-grade gliomas, treatment morbidity and tumor recurrence can represent major challenges for some PA patients. We performed scRNAseq of both tumor and non-tumor cells in newly-diagnosed PAs that contained KIAA1549-BRAF rearrangements. To confidently distinguish tumor cells from nontumor cells, we sorted cells by glial progenitor marker A2B5 status and profiled KIAA1549-BRAF fusion status of cells using a sensitive quantitative PCR-based assay. Results were validated using RNA in situ hybridization. When compared to higher-grade gliomas, a higher proportion of the PA tumor cells exhibited a differentiated, astrocyte-like phenotype. A smaller proportion of cells exhibited a progenitor-like phenotype with evidence of proliferation. These progenitor-like tumor cells expressed a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) program that was absent from higher-grade gliomas. Similar patterns of expression of genes associated with the astrocyte-like and MAPK gene programs were also seen in formalin fixed, paraffin embedded PA tissues using RNA in situ hybridization. Immune cells, especially microglia, comprised almost half of all cells in the PAs and accounted for differences in bulk expression profiles between tumor locations and subtypes. These single cell transcriptional data reveal a transcriptional developmental hierarchy in a pediatric low grade glioma that is skewed towards more mature brain cells compared to higher-grade gliomas. The results indicate that future analyses of bulk PA tissues should attempt to account for considerable infiltration by nontumor cells. Finally, the finding that a MAPK gene program is not uniformly expressed in PA tumor cells has implications for ongoing clinical investigations of therapies directed at the MAPK pathway for the treatment of PA. Citation Format: Zachary J. Reitman, Brenton Paolella, Guillaume Bergthold, Kristine Pelton, Robert Jones, Sarah Becker, Claire E. Sinai, Haley Malkin, Ying Huang, Leslie Grimmett, Zachary T. Herbert, Yu Sun, Jessica Weatherbee, John Alberta, John Daley, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen, Rosalind Segal, Daphne Haas-Kogan, Mariella G. Filbin, Mario L. Suva, Aviv Regev, Charles Stiles, Mark W. Kieran, Liliana Goumnerova, Keith L. Ligon, Alex K. Shalek, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, Rameen Beroukhim. Single cell RNA sequencing reveals mitogenic and progenitor gene programs inBRAF-rearranged pilocytic astrocytomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3647.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→