Anatomic Considerations for Injection of the Lateral Atlanto-Axial Joint
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define the potential complications of intra-articular steroid injections into the lateral C1-2 articulations and safety margins to the relevant structures. METHODS: A total of 488 contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiogram (CTA) "arch to vertex" studies were retrospectively reviewed for theoretical intersection of the vertebral artery or thecal sac and distance of the named structures from the anticipated/theoretical trajectory of injection into the lateral C1-C2 joint. RESULTS: Patients were 60.4±15.8 years old and 55.5% male. In total, seven vertebral arteries and 11 thecal sac theoretical intersections were found. In cases without a direct intersection, the distance from the trajectory (range) was 0.71±0.18 (0.22-1.44) cm to the vertebral artery and 0.6±0.22 (0.14-1.8) cm to the thecal sac. CONCLUSIONS: Although injection of steroid into the lateral C1-C2 articulation for pain management has historically been reported to carry risk of severe complications due to close proximity and location variability of surrounding structures, our study quantifies the potential risk of such injections. Further, our analysis suggests that preprocedural imaging should be considered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".