Relativistic corrections to Landau levels in the presence of a parallel linear electric field
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider an electron moving under a constant magnetic field (in the z-direction) and a \textit{linear} electric field parallel to the magnetic field above the z=0 plane and anti-parallel below the plane. Two frequencies characterize the system: the cyclotron frequency $ω_c$ corresponding to motion along the x-y plane and associated with the usual Landau levels, and a second frequency $ω_z$ corresponding to motion along the z-direction. In previous work, the non-relativistic energies of this system were obtained, and it was shown that an extra degeneracy (beyond the Landau degeneracy) occurs when the ratio $\text{w}=ω_c/ω_z$ is rational. In this paper, we use Dirac's equation to obtain compact formulas for the first and second order relativistic corrections to this system via perturbation theory. The formulas are expressed in terms of the two frequencies $ω_c$ and $ω_z$, and two quantum numbers, $n$ and $n_z$, both of which are non-negative integers. The first order correction is negative and lowers the original energies. We plot the energy (zeroth plus first order) versus the ratio $\text{w}$ and there are degeneracies at all points where lines intersect. However, the degeneracy does not occur at the same $\text{w}$ as before. To illustrate this, we show how the first order correction splits the energy levels for the case $ω_c=ω_z$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".