MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of dynamic arm and leg exercise on muscle sympathetic nerve activity and vascular conductance in the inactive leg

2019· article· en· W2955862703 on OpenAlexafffund
Connor J. Doherty, Trevor J. King, Anthony V. Incognito, Jordan B. Lee, Andrew D. Shepherd, Joseph Cacoilo, Joshua T. Slysz, Jamie F. Burr, Philip J. Millar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph-HumberToronto General HospitalUniversity of Guelph
FundersCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsMicroneurographySympathetic nervous systemLeg muscleMedicinePhysical exerciseAnatomyChemistryInternal medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyNeuroscienceHeart rateBlood pressureBaroreflexBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responses on local vascular conductance during exercise are not well established. Variations in exercise mode and active muscle mass can produce divergent MSNA responses. Therefore, we sought to examine the effects of small- versus large-muscle mass dynamic exercise on vascular conductance and MSNA responses in the inactive limb. Thirty-five participants completed two study visits in a randomized order. During visit 1, superficial femoral artery (SFA) blood flow (Doppler ultrasound) was assessed at rest and during steady-state rhythmic handgrip (RHG; 1:1 duty cycle, 40% maximal voluntary contraction), one-leg cycling (17 ± 3% peak power output), and concurrent exercise at the same intensities. During visit 2, MSNA (contralateral fibular nerve microneurography) was acquired successfully in 12/35 participants during the same exercise modes. SFA blood flow increased during RHG ( P < 0.0001) and concurrent exercise ( P = 0.03) but not cycling ( P = 0.91). SFA vascular conductance was unchanged during RHG ( P = 0.88) but reduced similarly during concurrent and cycling exercise (both P < 0.003). RHG increased MSNA burst frequency ( P = 0.04) without altering burst amplitude ( P = 0.69) or total MSNA ( P = 0.26). In contrast, cycling and concurrent exercise had no effects on MSNA burst frequency (both P ≥ 0.10) but increased burst amplitude (both P ≤ 0.001) and total MSNA (both P ≤ 0.007). Across all exercise modes, the changes in MSNA burst amplitude and SFA vascular conductance were correlated negatively ( r = −0.43, P = 0.02). In summary, the functional vascular consequences of alterations in sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscle are most closely associated with changes in MSNA burst amplitude, but not frequency, during low-intensity dynamic exercise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Low-intensity small- versus large-muscle mass exercise can elicit divergent effects on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). We examined the relationships between changes in MSNA (burst frequency and amplitude) and superficial femoral artery (SFA) vascular conductance during rhythmic handgrip, one-leg cycling, and concurrent exercise in the inactive leg. Only changes in MSNA burst amplitude were inversely associated with SFA vascular conductance responses. This result highlights the functional importance of measuring MSNA burst amplitude during exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207