Reduced brainstem functional connectivity in patients with peripheral autonomic failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
-value:4.25) (p-FDR < 0.005). During Valsalva, controls showed significantly more connectivity between the brainstem and both the left anterior (cerebellum 4/5) and bilateral posterior cerebellum (cerebellar 9 and left cerebellar 6). Other cerebellar regions included brainstem-to-vermis. Other brainstem-to-cortical and subcortical regions included: bilateral putamen, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex. There was a significant negative correlation between the brainstem-cerebellar connectivity and severity of autonomic dysfunction (p < .01). During recovery phase of the Valsalva, controls had greater brainstem connectivity to the left thalamus (T-value:4.17); PCC (T-value:3.32); right putamen (T-value:3.28); right paracingulate gyrus (T-value:3.25) and left posterior cerebellum (C9) (T-value:3.21) (p-FDR < 0.05). The effect sizes for each brainstem connectivity during Valsalva and recovery ranged from moderate to strong. Patients with autonomic failure show reduced coupling between the brainstem and regions of the central autonomic network, including the cerebellum, insula, thalamus and cingulate cortices. Connectivity was associated with autonomic impairment. These findings may suggest impaired brainstem connectivity in patients with autonomic failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".