MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955974589 · doi:10.4000/cdlm.11162

Colette Zytnicki, L’Algérie, terre de tourisme, Paris, Vendémiaire, 2016, 280 p.

2018· article· fr· W2955974589 on OpenAlexaff
Éric T. Jennings

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de la Méditerranée · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eric Jennings 1Si l'historiographie de l'Algérie coloniale s'est enrichie sensiblement aux cours des dernières décennies, force est de constater que la question du tourisme est longtemps restée curieusement négligée.La lacune était d'autant plus surprenante que l'histoire du tourisme en Indochine, en Afrique occidentale française, comme à Madagascar a retenu l'intérêt de plusieurs chercheurs, sans compter l'histoire du tourisme dans les colonies britanniques ou néerlandaises 1 . 2Or, l'important ouvrage de Colette Zytnicki démontre tout l'intérêt de cette thématique dans le cadre algérien, tant pour l'histoire économique que culturelle.L'historienne, reconnue pour ses nombreux travaux sur la colonisation, sur l'Afrique du Nord, et en histoire juive 2 , jette en effet un regard nouveau sur les nombreux acteurs liés au tourisme algérien.Citons pêle-mêle les populations locales, l'armée, les entreprises, les élites, la presse, les autorités dont les plans ambitieux pour le secteur touristique étaient souvent en décalage avec la réalité, les artistes, les politiciens, et les voyageurs eux-mêmes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de la MéditerranéeSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207