MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cortisol Responses During a Long Duration Incremental Exercise Protocol in the Heat while Wearing Personal Protective Equipment

2019· article· en· W2956103372 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas W. Service, Cory Coehoorn, Lynneth Stuart-Hill, Olave E. Krigolson, J. Patrick Neary

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSalivaHeart rateCore temperaturePersonal protective equipmentTreadmillInternal medicineAnesthesiaPhysical therapyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Blood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Individuals in occupations that wear personal protective equipment (PPE) are exposed to acute heat stress on a regular basis. There is no research evaluating the effects of rapid and uncompensable core temperature (Tc) acquisition, as which occurs when one is wearing PPE, on rate and magnitude of salivary cortisol appearance. PURPOSE: To determine the effects of rapid and uncompensable (Tc) acquisition on the rate and magnitude of salivary cortisol appearance. METHODS: Fourteen male subjects (33.6 ± 12.1 years) performed an incremental treadmill test to a termination point in a control session (CON) and an experimental session (PPE). Salivary samples were collected using an oral swab stimulated method. Saliva samples were processed and analyzed for salivary cortisol concentration using a highly sensitive enzyme immunoassay. Heart rate (HR), thermal comfort scale (TCS) and thermal sensation (TS) were also recorded at each 0.5°C increase in core temperature (Tc). RESULTS: There were significant differences in time to termination (TTT) (CON = 77.3 ± 12.6 min; PPE = 50.3 ± 6.9 min), pre-exercise HR (CON = 76.8 ± 4.8 bpm; PPE = 86.5 ± 5.1 bpm), post-exercise HR (CON = 161.1 ± 11.9 bpm; PPE = 179.6 ± 6.8 bpm), end-exercise Tc (CON = 38.57 ± 0.3°C; PPE = 39.01 ± 0.3°C), TCS (CON = 3.57 ± 0.6; PPE = 4.63 ± 0.3), and TS (CON = 7.57 ± 0.5; PPE = 8.67 ± 0.3). There was also a 0.04°C/min increase in Tc during PPE and a 0.02°C/min increase in Tc during CON. Significant cortisol results showed a difference in the rate of cortisol appearance (CON = 0.002 μg dL-1 min-1; PPE = 0.018 μg dL-1 min-1). There was a significant difference in mean cortisol values between start of exercise and the end of exercise (p ≤ 0.01). There was also a significant difference (p ≤ 0.05) between magnitude of salivary cortisol values at termination when comparing CON and PPE. CONCLUSION: Rapid and uncompensable Tc acquisition results in an elevated acute cortisol response. This will have implications for individuals who are employed in fields that are exposed to acute heat stress chronically. The acute effects of increased cortisol concentration are a decreased anabolic response, decreased cognitive performance, and decreased mood states. The chronic effects are many, but are mostly related to atherosclerosis development and subsequent cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207