Multi-phase level set algorithm based on fully convolutional networks (FCN-MLS) for retinal layer segmentation in SD-OCT images with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a function of the spatial position of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) image, retinal layer thickness is an important diagnostic indicator for many retinal diseases. Reliable segmentation of the retinal layer is necessary for extracting useful clinical information. However, manual segmentation of these layers is time-consuming and prone to bias. Furthermore, due to speckle noise, low image contrast, retinal detachment, and also irregular morphological features make the automatic segmentation task challenging. To alleviate these challenges, in this paper, we propose a new coarse-fine framework combining the full convolutional network (FCN) with a multiphase level set (named FCN-MLS) for automatic segmentation of nine boundaries in retinal spectral OCT images. In the coarse stage, FCN is used to learn the characteristics of specific retinal layer boundaries and achieve classification of four retinal layers. The boundaries are then extracted and the remaining boundaries are initialized based on a priori information about the thickness of the retinal layer. In order to prevent the overlapping of the segmentation interfaces, a regional restriction technique is used in the multi-phase level to evolve the boundaries to achieve fine nine retinal layers segmentation. Experimental results on 1280 B-scans show that the proposed method can segment nine retinal boundaries accurately. Compared with the manual delineation, the overall mean absolute boundary location difference and the overall mean absolute thickness difference were 5.88 ± 2.38μm and 5.81 ± 2.19μm, which showed a good consistency with manual segmentation by the physicians. Our experimental results also outperform state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".