MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2956684337 · doi:10.1364/boe.10.003987

Multi-phase level set algorithm based on fully convolutional networks (FCN-MLS) for retinal layer segmentation in SD-OCT images with central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC)

2019· article· en· W2956684337 on OpenAlex
Yanan Ruan, Jie Xue, Tianlai Li, Danhua Liu, Hua Lu, Meirong Chen, Tingting Liu, Sijie Niu, Dengwang Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedical Optics Express · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligenceOptical coherence tomographyRetinalPattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationLevel set (data structures)Computer visionSpeckle noiseSpeckle patternOpticsOphthalmologyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a function of the spatial position of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) image, retinal layer thickness is an important diagnostic indicator for many retinal diseases. Reliable segmentation of the retinal layer is necessary for extracting useful clinical information. However, manual segmentation of these layers is time-consuming and prone to bias. Furthermore, due to speckle noise, low image contrast, retinal detachment, and also irregular morphological features make the automatic segmentation task challenging. To alleviate these challenges, in this paper, we propose a new coarse-fine framework combining the full convolutional network (FCN) with a multiphase level set (named FCN-MLS) for automatic segmentation of nine boundaries in retinal spectral OCT images. In the coarse stage, FCN is used to learn the characteristics of specific retinal layer boundaries and achieve classification of four retinal layers. The boundaries are then extracted and the remaining boundaries are initialized based on a priori information about the thickness of the retinal layer. In order to prevent the overlapping of the segmentation interfaces, a regional restriction technique is used in the multi-phase level to evolve the boundaries to achieve fine nine retinal layers segmentation. Experimental results on 1280 B-scans show that the proposed method can segment nine retinal boundaries accurately. Compared with the manual delineation, the overall mean absolute boundary location difference and the overall mean absolute thickness difference were 5.88 ± 2.38μm and 5.81 ± 2.19μm, which showed a good consistency with manual segmentation by the physicians. Our experimental results also outperform state-of-the-art methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it