A vortex interaction mechanism for generating energy and enstrophy fluctuations in high-symmetric turbulence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Turbulent vortex dynamics is investigated in triply periodic turbulent flow with Kida’s high symmetry (Kida, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, vol. 54, 1985, pp. 2132–2136) by means of unstable periodic motion representing both the statistical and dynamical properties of turbulence (van Veen et al., Fluid Dyn. Res., vol. 38, 2006, pp. 19–46). In the periodic motion, the large-scale columnar vortices, the smaller-scale vortices and the large-amplitude axial waves on the large-scale columnar vortices are detected. In terms of mutual dynamical interaction between the large-scale columnar vortices and smaller-scale vortices, we demonstrate a cyclic process of excitation of the axial waves, which leads to large-amplitude fluctuations of the total kinetic energy and enstrophy. This cyclic process is characterised by three distinct phases and is therefore reminiscent of the regeneration cycle of near-wall turbulence structures (Hamilton et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 287, 1995, pp. 317–348). Notably, such oscillatory behaviour is observed even in freely decaying turbulence as a consequence of the instantaneous energy transfer from smaller to larger scales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".