Conformational Landscape of <i>m</i>-Anisic Acid and Its Complexes with Formic Acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four conformers of m-anisic acid were observed in a supersonic expansion using Fourier transform microwave spectroscopy. These conformers correspond to different relative orientations of the acid and methoxy groups and have their planar skeletons stabilized by resonance. When formic acid was present in the jet, the spectra of four m-anisic acid–formic acid heterodimer conformers were detected. The complexes are formed from the interaction of formic acid with each of the four observed conformers of m-anisic acid through the typical acid–acid sequential cycle with a double O–H···O═C hydrogen bond interaction in a pseudo eight-membered ring arrangement. The four heterodimer forms retain the same four m-anisic acid conformational geometries and the same relative abundances of the m-anisic acid monomeric forms in the supersonic expansion. This proves that a kinetic mechanism dominates the formation of complexes in the jet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".