Neurodevelopmental and behavioural outcomes of HIV-exposed uninfected and HIV-unexposed children at 2–3 years of age in Cape Town, South Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Successful vertical HIV transmission prevention programmes (VTP) have resulted in an expanding population of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants whose growth, health and neurodevelopmental outcomes could have consequences for future resource allocation. We compared neurodevelopmental and behavioural outcomes in a prospective cohort of 2-3 year old HEU and HIV-unexposed uninfected (HU) children.Women living with and without HIV and their infants were enrolled within three days of birth from a low-risk midwife obstetric unit in Cape Town, South Africa during 2012 and 2013, under WHO Option A VTP guidelines. HIV-uninfected children aged 30-42 months were assessed using the Bayley scales of Infant Development-Third edition (BSID) and Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire (SDQ).Thirty-two HEU and 27 HU children (mean birth weight 3048g vs 3096g) were assessed. HEU children performed as well as HU children on BSID cognitive, language and motor domains. Mean scores fell within the low average range. Mothers of HEU children reported fewer conduct problems but stunting was associated with increased total difficulties on the SDQ.HEU and HU children's performance on the BSID was similar. In this low-risk cohort, HIV exposure did not confer additional risk. Stunting was associated with increased behavioural problems irrespective of HIV exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".