A Comparative Whole Genome Sequence Analysis Leads to Identification of Repeat-Associated Evolutionarily Conserved miRNAs in Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are evolutionarily conserved small noncoding RNAs, which play important regulatory roles in various biological processes. In this study, we have developed a computational approach for detecting conserved miRNAs based on comparison of whole genome sequences of closely related species by considering various key features of experimentally validated miRNAs. By applying this approach, we have identified 34 new miRNAs from Bombyx mori (L.), which are also conserved in Drosophila melanogaster (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). Most of these miRNAs were associated with repeat region of the genome. We did an expression analysis of the 34 newly predicted miRNAs and found that 30 of these miRNAs are expressing in different tissues of B. mori. Besides, we have also predicted the putative targets of these miRNAs in B. mori based on several known characteristic features of miRNA::mRNA duplexes and found that these targets include diverse range of functions, suggesting multiple layers of gene regulation of various important biological processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it