Abstract 358: First Trimester Human Umbilical Cord Perivascular Cells (FTM HUCPVCs) Maintain High Expression Levels of Angiogenic Factors and Have Superior Pro-angiogenic Effects on Endothelial Networks When Compared to Term HUCPVCs and BMSCs in an ex-vivo Rat Aortic Ring Assay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Features of an ideal cell type, that would be conducive to vascular regeneration include (1) expression of pro-angiogenic genes (2) secretion of factors that promote developing or regenerating vasculature, and (3) maintenance of pro-angiogenic properties in the microvascular niche. Hypothesis: FTM HUCPVCs, a young rich source of mesenchymal stromal-like cells (MSCs) are ideal candidates for vascular regeneration due to their high expression of pro-angiogenic factors. Methods: The paracrine angiogenic potential of 3 types of MSCs was evaluated and compared using ex vivo tissue culture of rat aortic rings. Aorta sections were embedded into Matrigel™, cells were added to transwell membranes (pore=0.1μm, EBM 2% FBS) and combined with aortic rings (Day 0). Radial network growth and total loop formation were monitored by microscopy. Endothelial networks were quantified by ImageJ TM software. p values were calculated using ANOVA. (N=3 experiments, n=3 replicates). At day 7, the MSCs were isolated from transwells, human cytokine gene expression levels were measured using human growth factor profiler qPCR array (Qiagen, normalizers: GAPDH, βACT). Ct>35 considered negligible. Results: In the transwell aortic ring assay, FTM HUCPVCs induced significantly greater network growths when compared to term HUCPVCs (p≤0.0001), BMSCs (p≤0.0001) and untreated rings (p≤0.05). Quantification of network loop formation showed that FTM HUCPVCs induced greater numbers of closed loops when compared to term HUCPVCs (p≤0.0001), BMSCs (p≤0.0001) and untreated networks (p≤0.0001). Human growth factor qPCR array showed a high expression of angiogenic factors (Ct<25 cycle) both at day0 and day7 of co-culture, including BMP1, GDNF, MDK, NRG1, PDGFc, VEGFa, and VEGFc. Most cytokine expression levels were maintained up to 7 days in co-culture with 1 gene upregulated (BMP6 ΔCt>3), and 3 downregulated genes (FGF19, FGF9, NRTN ΔCt>3) at day 7 when compared to day 1. Conclusion: Compared to older sources of MSCs, FTM HUCPVCs promote developing endothelial networks in vitro via paracrine mechanisms and maintain the high expression of pro-angiogenic factors when cultures with endothelial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".