MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960127625 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afz062.02

91PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF DELIRIUM IN ELDERLY UNDERGOING CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY

2019· article· en· W2960127625 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alice Bourke, V. Fitton, Vanessa J. Scotland, J Chongvathanakij

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDeliriumCohortCardiothoracic surgeryCohort studyGeneral surgeryEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Delirium is common in the post-operative cardiothoracic surgery setting especially in older age. Delirium is associated with poor post-operative outcomes. The aims of this study were to review predictors of delirium, demographics and outcomes in those over 70 years undergoing cardio- thoracic surgery who had delirium compared with those without delirium. Methods: Prospective cohort study including those over 70 years undergoing cardiothoracic surgery. Data collected preoperatively included age, gender, supports, mobility, Charlson comorbidity index, living status, MMSE, number of delirium risk factors and Edmonton Frailty score. Outcome data included discharge destination, code blacks, nurse special, falls, early mortality, return to theatre and length of stay. If delirium present type identified. Statistical software used SAS 9.4. Tests included Wilcoxon Rank Sum test and Fisher’s Exact test. Ethics approval CALHN R20160219. Results: N = 39 participants included in cohort. The mean age was 76.64 years (SD = 4.6). 35.9% female. Preoperatively 64.1% had home supports, 20.5% required walking aids and 28.2% lived alone. Mean MMSE 28/30(SD = 2.1), mean number of delirium risk factors 3(SD = 0.9), mean Charlson comorbidity index 3(SD = 1.4) and mean Edmonton Frailty Scale 5/17(SD = 1.7). Postoperatively prevalence of delirium 46%. Types of delirium comprised 55.6% hypoactive, 16.7% mixed and 27.8% hyperactive. Average length of stay total 11 days and 4.9 in ICU. Outcomes 7.7 % mortality and 58.9% discharged directly home. 2.6% had a code black and nurse special, 7.9% had falls and 12.8% returned to theatre. Those who developed delirium had significant association with preoperative lower MMSE (p = 0.03), higher Edmonton Frailty Score (p = 0.01) and living with others (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Delirium is common in the older cardiothoracic patient. Statistically significant preoperative predictors of delirium included lower MMSE, higher Edmonton Frailty score and living with others. Preoperative assessment of the elderly in preparation for cardio thoracic surgery can allow those who are at risk of delirium to be identified, given education regarding delirium and interventions to reduce post-operative delirium and therefore improve surgical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207