MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960616315 · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00792

What Comes First: Return to School or Return to Activity for Youth After Concussion? Maybe We Don't Have to Choose

2019· article· en· W2960616315 on OpenAlexafffund
Carol DeMatteo, Sarah Randall, Chia-Yu A. Lin, Everett Claridge

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neurology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsCentre for Disability Prevention and RehabilitationMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsConcussionMedicineReturn to sportGuidelineProspective cohort studyCohortPhysical therapyInjury preventionPoison controlInternal medicineAthletesEmergency medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: Return to School (RTS) and Return to Activity/Play (RTA) protocols are important in concussion management. Debate exists as to sequence and whether progression can occur simultaneously. Experts recommend that children/youth fully return to school, before beginning RTA protocols. This study investigates recovery trajectories of children/youth while following RTA and RTS protocols simultaneously, with the following objectives: 1) compare rates of progression through the stages of both protocols; 2) compare symptom trajectories during protocol progression; 3) determine if integration of RTS and RTA protocols can occur concurrently without interrupting recovery trajectories. Methods: In a 3-year prospective-cohort study of 139 children/youth aged 5-18 years with concussive injury, self-reported symptoms using PCSS and stage of protocols were evaluated every 48 hours using electronic surveys until full return to school and activity/sport were attained. Information regarding school accommodation and achievement was collected. Results: Sample mean age is 13 years, 45% male. Youth are returning to school with accommodations significantly quicker than RTA (p=.001). Significant negative correlations between total PCSS score and stage of RTS protocol were found at: one-week (r=-0.376, p<0.0001; r=-0.317, p=0.0003), one-month (r=-0.483, p<0.0001; r=-0.555, p<0.0001) and three-months (r=-0.598, p<0.0001; r=-0.617, p<0.0001); indicating lower symptom scores correlated with higher guideline stages. Median full return to school time is 35 days with 21% of youth symptomatic at full return. Median return time to full sport competition is 39.5 days with 15% still symptomatic. Sixty-four percent of youth reported experiencing school problems during recovery and 30% at symptom resolution, with 31% reporting a drop in their grades during recovery and 18% at study completion. Conclusion: Children/youth return to school faster than they return to play despite symptom profiles. Youth can progress simultaneously through the RTS and RTA protocols during stages 1-3. Considering the numbers of youth having school difficulties post-concussion, full contact sport, stage 6, of RTA, should be delayed until full and successful reintegration back to school has been achieved. In light of the huge variability in recovery, balancing symptoms with cognitive and physical demands is still the challenge for each individual child, warranting further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeurologySame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207