MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960706029

Sustainable Printing Inks

2019· article· en· W2960706029 on OpenAlexaff
Tuen-Ching Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPhotopolymerization techniques and applications
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRosinEnvironmentally friendlyEpoxidized soybean oilPolymerizationChemical industryWaste managementRaw materialPolymer scienceMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryChemistryPolymerEngineeringResin acid
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Printing is important to industries, schools, libraries and homes. Hence, it is important to investigate and develop eco-friendly methods for printing inks. In the food industry, one of the wastes is used frying oil, which can be epoxidized and polymerized to produce binders in printing ink. Another method is to utilize epoxidized soybean oil as a UV-curable acrylate oligomer via cross-linking in order to be repurposed as a binder. Both of these solutions could prevent solvent emissions, reduce pollution or waste, help regulating harmful organic materials and replacing unsustainable petroleum-based printing inks. In terms of chemical synthesis, scholars have suggested that resin precursors for lithographic inks could employ low-molecular soy oil-based rosin esters. Next, the esters are cross-linked through radical polymerization, which is induced by heat along with radical initiators like peroxides. Peroxides allow the ink to dry instantly, which is desired in printing process. Finally, the sustainable inks could be sold to printer companies, newspaper companies, advertising companies and consumers for a cheaper price with lower production costs.   Faculty Mentor: Samuel Mugo Department: Chemistry

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicPhotopolymerization techniques and applicationsFrench-language works237,207