Cognitive disorders in chronic kidney disease and hemodialysis patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Cognitive impairment (CI) is common in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and among those treated with hemodialysis (HD). It may jeopardize treatment adherence by affecting the efficiency of every-day tasks, including correct medication and dietary rules. The severity of CKD is associated with the severity of CI, independent of age, education, and other key confounders. It is important to identify those patients with CI to reduce the considerable morbidity associated with this condition and improve their quality of life. Objectives The aim of the present study is to assess cognitive functions in patients with chronic renal diseases and patients on regular HD and to identify CI in these patients. Patients and methods A total of 30 patients with CKD were recruited from the outpatient clinic of Alamerya General Hospital (group I), and 30 HD patients were enrolled in the dialysis unit of the Alamerya General Hospital (group II). Moreover, 30 sex-matched and age-matched patients were recruited as controls (group III). Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Depression Anxiety Stress scale-21 were used as cognitive and neurological tests. Result The mean executive functions score was significantly lower in group II (2.37±0.67) in comparison with group I (3.33±0.48), with a P value less than 0.001, and it is also significantly lower in groups I and II in comparison with the control group (3.90±0.31), with a P value of 0.002 and less than 0.001, respectively. The mean attention score was significantly lower in group I (4.20±0.81) and group II (4.23±0.94) in comparison with the control group (5.27±0.69), with a P value of less than 0.001. The mean memory score was significantly lower in group I (3.10±0.40) and group II (2.57±0.90) in comparison with the control group (4.47±0.73), with a P value of less than 0.001. The mean total MoCA test score was significantly lower in group II (22.87±1.68) in comparison with group I (24.27±1.26), with a P value of less than 0.017, and it is also significantly lower in groups I and II in comparison with the control group (28.33±1.47), with a P value of less than 0.001. Conclusion Impaired renal function affects total MoCA score in the studied groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".