MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2961410388 · doi:10.1089/jayao.2019.0024

Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors Have a Substantially Lower Cardiorespiratory Fitness Level Than Healthy Canadians Despite a Clinically Equivalent Level of Physical Activity

2019· article· en· W2961410388 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Maxime Caru, Mariia Samoilenko, Simon Drouin, Valerie LeMay, Laurence Kern, Lucía Romo, Laurence Bertout, Geneviève Lefebvre, Grégor Andelfinger, Maja Krajinović, Caroline Laverdière, Daniel Sinnett, Daniel Curnier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessMedicineLymphoblastic LeukemiaPhysical activitySurvivorship curveYoung adultPhysical fitnessPhysical therapyPediatricsGerontologyLeukemiaInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: As the survival rate of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) continues to improve, the physical deconditioning is becoming an increasingly common problem in survivors. The aim of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory fitness and physical activity levels of survivors and control participants. Methods: A total of 221 childhood ALL survivors (114 males and 107 females), diagnosed between 1987 and 2010 and treated according to Dana Farber Cancer Institute-ALL 87-01 to 05-01 protocols at Sainte-Justine University Health Center (SJUHC), Montreal (Canada), and 825 control participants (364 males and 461 females), recruited in the Canadian Health Measures Survey (cycle 2) during 2009 to 2011 by Statistics Canada, were included in our analyses. In both survivors and controls, cardiorespiratory fitness and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were assessed. Results: Survivors' V̇O2 peak was found to be 22% lower than that of controls. Cardiorespiratory fitness was different between the survivors (32.4 ± 8.3 mL/(kg·min); β = 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.14) and the controls (41.6 ± 9.4 mL/(kg·min); β = 0.16; 95% CI 0.13–0.18), despite a clinically equivalent level of MVPA [survivors (27.5 ± 27.4 min/day) and controls (33.4 ± 24.2 min/day)]. Status (being survivor) and the age of the participants were negatively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness, whereas MVPA and male gender were positively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness. Conclusion: We observed that for a clinically equivalent level of MVPA, cardiorespiratory fitness was significantly lower in survivors compared with controls. Our findings showed that female survivors were most affected, compared with male survivors. These findings allow further understanding of the physiological differences between childhood ALL survivors and control participants and have important implications for this high-risk population of survivors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Adolescent and Young Adult OncologySame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207