MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2961985124 · doi:10.1101/704627

Tetrad analysis without tetrad dissection: Meiotic recombination and genomic diversity in the yeast <i>Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris)</i>

2019· preprint· en· W2961985124 on OpenAlexaff
Stephanie Braun‐Galleani, Julie A. Dias, Aisling Y. Coughlan, Adam P. Ryan, Kevin P. Byrne, Kenneth H. Wolfe

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicFungal and yeast genetics research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTetradMeiosisBiologyGeneticsGenetic diversityRecombinationAscus (bryozoa)Homologous recombinationPloidyGenomePichia pastorisYeastSporeBotanyGeneRecombinant DNAPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Komagataella phaffii is a yeast widely used in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, and is one of the two species that were formerly called Pichia pastoris . However, almost all laboratory work on K. phaffii has been done on strains derived from a single natural isolate, CBS7435. There is little information about the genetic properties of K. phaffii or its sequence diversity. Genetic analysis is difficult because, although K. phaffii makes asci with four spores, the spores are small and tend to clump together, making the asci hard to dissect. Here, we sequenced the genomes of all the known isolates of this species, and find that K. phaffii has only been isolated from nature four times. We analyzed the meiotic recombination landscape in a cross between auxotrophically marked strains derived from two isolates that differ at 44,000 single nucleotide polymorphism sites. We conducted tetrad analysis by making use of the property that haploids of this species do not mate in rich media, which enabled us to isolate and sequence the four types of haploid cell that are present in the colony that forms when a tetratype ascus germinates. We found that approximately 25 crossovers occur per meiosis, which is 3.5 times fewer than in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Recombination is suppressed, and genetic diversity among natural isolates is low, in a region around centromeres that is much larger than the centromeres themselves. Our method of tetrad analysis without tetrad dissection will be applicable to other species whose spores do not mate spontaneously after germination. Author summary To better understand the basic genetics of the budding yeast Komagataella phaffii , which has many applications in biotechnology, we investigated its genetic diversity and its meiotic recombination landscape. We made a genetic cross between strains derived from two natural isolates, and developed a method for characterizing the genomes of the four spores resulting from meiosis, which were previously impossible to isolate. We found that K. phaffii has a lower recombination rate than Saccharomyces cerevisiae . It shows a large zone of suppressed recombination around its centromeres, which may be due to the structural differences between centromeres in K. phaffii and S. cerevisiae .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicFungal and yeast genetics research→French-language works237,207→