Axial heterostructure nanoarray as all‐solid‐state micro‐supercapacitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The end-to-end axial heterojunction one-dimensional nanoarray combined poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) and manganese dioxide (MnO2) have been successfully designed and fabricated. The electrochemical performance was investigated in detail after processing the axial PEDOT/MnO2 heterostructure nanoarray (APMHN) into flexible micro-supercapacitors, namely, PM-MSC. The presence of flexible PEDOT segment effectively improved the conductivity and also provided an important material basis for the preparation of flexible PM-MSC. Further, PEDOT has good contact with both Au substrate and MnO2 segment, ensuring that the charge can quickly shuttle back and forth between the electrode and the current collector. The PM-MSC showed the highest specific capacitance of 209.89 mF·cm−2 compared with the P-MSC assembled from PEDOT nanoarray and M-MSC assembled from MnO2 nanoarray. The PM-MSC possesses good flexibility, making the capacitance performance of the PM-MSC show almost no deterioration under the 180° bent state. Moreover, several series or parallel PM-MSCs enable a variety of electronic devices to work properly. The APMHN exhibits some new advantages, enabling the integration of physical and chemical properties of the two separate components, while providing a new way of thinking for the design and manufacture of MSC for flexibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".