Empowering Reinforcement Learning on Big Sensed Data for Intrusion Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless sensor and actuator networks are widely adopted in various applications such as critical infrastructure monitoring where sensory data in big volumes and velocity are prone to security vulnerabilities for the network and the monitored infrastructure. Despite the vulnerabilities of the big data phenomenon, intelligent data analytics technique can enable the analysis of huge amount of data and identification of intrusive behavior in real time. The main performance targets for any Intrusion Detection System (IDS) involve accuracy, detection, precision, F1 score and Receiver Operating Characteristics. Pursuant to these, this paper proposes a big data-driven IDS approach in Wireless Sensor Networks by harnessing reinforcement learning techniques on a hybrid IDS framework. We study the performance of RL-IDS and compare it to the previously proposed Adaptive Machine Learning-based IDS (AML-IDS) namely the Adaptively Supervised and Clustered Hybrid IDS (ASCH-IDS). The experimental results show that RL-IDS can achieve ≈ 100% success in detection, accuracy and precisionrecall rates whereas its predecessor ASCH-IDS performs with an accuracy level that is slightly above 99%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it