MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962482334 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00742

A Candidate Regulatory Variant at the TREM Gene Cluster Confer Alzheimer’s Disease Risk by Modulating Both Amyloid-β Pathology and Neuronal Degeneration

2019· article· en· W2962482334 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Meiling Tian, Xiao-Neng Ni, Jieqiong Li, Chen‐Chen Tan, Xi‐Peng Cao, Lan Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInflammation biomarkers and pathways
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiGenentechIXICONational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationMeso Scale DiagnosticsNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationF. Hoffmann-La RocheUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBioClinicaBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyBiogenFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsTREM2DementiaAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeCerebrospinal fluidPathogenesisDiseaseNeuroimagingInternal medicineMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseAmyloid (mycology)OncologyPsychologyPathologyReceptorNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rs9357347 located at the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM) gene cluster could increase TREM2 and TREM-like transcript 1 (TREML1) brain gene expression, which is considered to play a protective role against Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objectives: To investigate the role of rs9357347 in AD pathogenesis by exploring the effects of rs9357347 on AD specific biomarkers. Methods: This study analyzed the association of rs9357347 with AD-related cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and neuroimaging markers from 201 cognitively normal (CN) older adults, 349 elders with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 172 elders with AD dementia from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We next analyzed the association in 259 amyloid-β positive (Aβ+) elders and 117 amyloid-β negative (Aβ-) elders (Aβ+: CSF Aβ1-42 ≤ 192pg/ml; Aβ-: CSF Aβ1-42 > 192pg/ml). Associations were tested using multiple linear regression models at baseline. Furthermore, multiple mixed-effects models were used in a longitudinal study which lasted 4 years. Results: At baseline, we found that rs9357347 had association with CSF Aβ1-42 in CN group (β = 0.357, P=0.009). In AD group, rs9357347 was associated with total tau (T-tau) level (β = -0.436, P = 0.007). Moreover, the strong influence exerted by rs9357347 on T-tau was also seen in Aβ+ group (β = -0.202, P = 0.036). In the longitudinal study, rs9357347 was also found to be associated with Aβ1-42 in CN group (β = 0.329, P= 0.023). In AD group, the mutation of rs9357347 was associated with slower accumulation of T-tau (β = -0.472, P = 0.002) and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau 181 [β = -0.330, P = 0.019]). Furthermore, the obvious influence exerted by rs9357347 on T-tau was also seen in Aβ+ group (β = -0.241, P = 0.013). Conclusion: This study suggested that rs9357347 reduced the risk of AD by modulating both amyloid-β pathology and neuronal degeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicInflammation biomarkers and pathwaysFrench-language works237,207