The Adoption of Cost-Benefit Analysis as an Indicator for Evaluate the Accounting Performance of Business Entities(The Case Study for Canadian Railway)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study tested the relationship between the total cost and expected benefits to the project that proposed by top management of company selected. It was based on a key hypothesis that states, the outcome of proper and accurate analysis of the cost-benefit relationship can be considered as an indicator that can be used to assess the financial benefit of the proposed project and at the same time evaluation the accounting performance of the accountants who responsible for carrying out this process. The study contributed to formulating a group of objectives, in order to achieve the main objective of the study and test the main hypothesis, a study sample was chosen (Canadian Railway Co.) by examine a certain case in it related to study. Finally, the study reached a number of conclusions and recommendations, most importantly are, the application of the concept CBA in a proper manner will help the company to obtain a set of benefits, not limited to the assessing of the performance of accountants within company but expanded as to include the encouraging the accounting authorities within country in the selection of best accounting practices and applications that enhancing the accountants duties in future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".