MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2962662998 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1821296116

The orphan nuclear receptor NR4A3 controls the differentiation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells following microbial stimulation

2019· article· en· W2962662998 on OpenAlexafffund
Salix Boulet, Jean‐François Daudelin, Livia Odagiu, Adam‐Nicolas Pelletier, Tae Jin Yun, Sylvie Lesage, Cheolho Cheong, Nathalie Labrecque

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNuclear Receptors and Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Clinical Research InstituteUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
FundersInstitute of Infection and ImmunityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGovernment of Canada
KeywordsOrphan receptorCell biologyBiologyTranscription factorMonocyteImmune systemDendritic cellStimulationImmunologyGeneticsNeuroscienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to microbial stimulation, monocytes can differentiate into macrophages or monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MoDCs) but the molecular requirements guiding these possible fates are poorly understood. In addition, the physiological importance of MoDCs in the host cellular and immune responses to microbes remains elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the nuclear orphan receptor NR4A3 is required for the proper differentiation of MoDCs but not for other types of DCs. Indeed, the generation of DC-SIGN + MoDCs in response to LPS was severely impaired in Nr4a3 −/− mice, which resulted in the inability to mount optimal CD8 + T cell responses to gram-negative bacteria. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that NR4A3 is required to skew monocyte differentiation toward MoDCs, at the expense of macrophages, and allows the acquisition of migratory characteristics required for MoDC function. Altogether, our data identify that the NR4A3 transcription factor is required to guide the fate of monocytes toward MoDCs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences→Same topicNuclear Receptors and Signaling→French-language works237,207→