MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962679095 · doi:10.1090/ert/517

Representations associated to small nilpotent orbits for complex Spin groups

2018· article· en· W2962679095 on OpenAlexaff
Dan Barbasch, Wan-Yu Tsai

Bibliographic record

VenueRepresentation Theory of the American Mathematical Society · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Security Agency
KeywordsAlgorithmAnnotationArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a comparison between the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -structure of unipotent representations and regular sections of bundles on nilpotent orbits for complex groups of type <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper D"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">D</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . Precisely, let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G 0 equals upper S p i n left-parenthesis 2 n comma double-struck upper C right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>Spin</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ⁡ </mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="double-struck">C</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G_0 =\operatorname {Spin}(2n,\mathbb {C})</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be the Spin complex group as a real group, and let <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K approximately-equals upper G 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ≅ </mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K\cong G_0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> be the complexification of the maximal compact subgroup of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper G 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">G_0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . We compute <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">K</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -spectra of the regular functions on some small nilpotent orbits <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="script upper O"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\mathcal {O}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> transforming according to characters <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="psi"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mi> ψ </mml:mi> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">\psi</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> of <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C Subscript upper K Baseline left-parenthesis script upper O right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C_{ K}(\mathcal {O})</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> trivial on the connected component of the identity <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper C Subscript upper K Baseline left-parenthesis script upper O right-parenthesis Superscript 0"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>C</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi class="MJX-tex-caligraphic" mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">C_{ K}(\mathcal {O})^0</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> . We then match them with the <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper K"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">{K}</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> -types of the genuine (i.e., representations which do not factor to <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper S upper O left-parenthesis 2 n comma double-struck upper C right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>SO</mml:mi> <mml:mo> ⁡ </mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.347
Threshold uncertainty score0.725

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepresentation Theory of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207