MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962705146 · doi:10.1080/00927872.2019.1612421

On the module structure of the center of hyperelliptic Krichever–Novikov algebras II

2019· article· en· W2962705146 on OpenAlexafffund
Ben Cox, Xiangqian Guo, Mee Seong Im, Kaiming Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Algebra · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaSimons Foundation
KeywordsMathematicsInvertible matrixHyperelliptic curveDihedral groupCenter (category theory)Extension (predicate logic)CombinatoricsAlgebraically closed fieldNovikov self-consistency principlePure mathematicsGroup (periodic table)Algebra over a fieldCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let R=C[t±1,u:u2=t(t−α1)⋯(t−α2n)], corresponding to a nonsingular hyperelliptic curve. Let g⊗R be the corresponding current Lie algebra. The universal central extension of g⊗R is ĝ=g⊗R⊕ΩR/dR, where ΩR/dR is a module over Aut(R). In earlier work, Cox–Im described how ΩR/dR decomposes into a direct sum of irreducible representations when Aut(R) was the cyclic group C2k or the dihedral group D2k. In this paper, we precisely determine Aut(R), giving examples of 2n-tuples (α1,…,α2n) when Aut(R) is Gn=Dicn,Un≅D2n, or Un (n even). We then describe the decomposition of ΩR/dR when Aut(R) is D2k.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in AlgebraSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207