Do stressful life events during pregnancy modify associations between phthalates and anogenital distance in newborns?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anogenital distance (AGD) has been used as a marker of fetal androgen action to identify endocrine disrupting chemicals. A US study (TIDES) has reported that the association between some phthalates and reduced AGD in males was only apparent in sons of mothers reporting no stressful life events (SLEs) during pregnancy. The objective of the current study was to examine the potential modifying effect of SLEs and their subjective impact on associations between prenatal phthalates and AGD. First trimester urines from the MIREC Study were analysed for phthalate metabolites and AGD was measured in neonates. Post-delivery, the women answered questions on SLEs during the pregnancy. Women reporting 1 or more SLEs during pregnancy were considered a "higher stressor" group, whereas women reporting no SLEs or who reported a SLE that was perceived as not at all stressful were considered a "lower stressor" group. Multivariable linear regression models were fit stratified by stressor group. Maternal stressor, AGD and phthalates results were available for 153 females and 147 males. A summary measure of androgen-disrupting phthalates (Σ AD) was associated with significantly longer AGDs in females from the higher stressor group. These effect sizes were increased when the perceived impact was restricted to moderately or very much stressful. In males, all phthalates were associated with longer anopenile distance (APD), regardless of stressor group; however, higher Σ AD was associated with significantly longer APD in the lower stressor group. In contrast to the TIDES study, we did not observe shorter AGDs in male infants prenatally exposed to di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalates, regardless of maternal stressor level. In conclusion, we were unable to replicate the findings of the TIDES study, but did find some evidence that prenatal SLEs may modify associations between phthalates and female AGD. Further research with other populations and measures of prenatal stress may shed more light on whether prenatal stress is an important effect modifier of associations between phthalates (or other chemicals) and anogenital distance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".