Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia: Expression Pattern of Glutamine Synthetase and a Potential Role for Hepatic Progenitor Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is one of the most frequent causes of noncirrhotic intrahepatic hypertension, but is a difficult histologic diagnosis. The expression of glutamine synthetase (GS) and cytokeratin 7 (CK7) has been reported to be increased in other regenerative/vascular conditions, while CK7 and BerEP4 are also markers of hepatic progenitor cells. The aims of this study were to investigate the use of GS, CK7, and BerEP4 as the potential markers for NRH. This is a retrospective case series of NRH at Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal between 1993 and 2013. Normal liver from partial hepatectomies for tumors were used as controls. GS, CK7, CK19, and BerEP4 immunohistochemical stains were performed on all specimens. Immunohistochemical staining patterns were scored from 0 to 3+. NRH was identified in 46 samples obtained from 26 patients. Liver chemistry profile was cholestatic in 45% of the patients. In 93% of the NRH cases, there was abnormal zone 2 expression of GS. Weak panacinar GS staining was seen in all the NRH cases. Aberrant CK7 expression was present in all cases of NRH, but were not associated with cholestasis. BerEP4 was overexpressed in 47% of the NRH cases (P<0.05); all cases with diffuse BerEP4 staining also showed extensive CK7 expression (P<0.01). NRH showed increased immunohistochemical GS staining that may support its morphologic diagnosis. Our findings suggest that there is an activation of hepatic progenitor cells in NRH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".