MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963158160

Geochemical analysis of thermal fluids from southern Mount Meager, British Columbia, Canada

2019· article· en· W2963158160 on OpenAlex
Katherine Huang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSkemman · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMountGeologyArchaeologyGeographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geothermal exploration has been ongoing intermittently in the Mount Meager geothermal area, British Columbia, Canada, since the 1970s. However, a geochemical interpretation of the many fluid samples collected during this time period has not been carried out for several decades, leaving gaps in understanding of the system which modern techniques can help fill. Thermal fluids from springs and wells in the southern Mount Meager geothermal field were analyzed to understand the fluid origin, controls on chemistry from effects of mixing and water-rock interaction, and to determine the reservoir temperature and composition. Chloride and boron concentrations ranged from 100 to 3300 ppm and 0.3 to 28 ppm, respectively. These very high conservative element concentrations cannot alone be explained by rock dissolution and are instead likely supplied by a single magmatic source. Calculated reservoir compositions suggest that select deep wells have experienced significant CO2 degassing from reservoir to the surface, and high SO4 content present from surface samples is traced down to the reservoir. These data corroborate the hypothesis that a magmatic component exists and contributes to B, Cl, CO2 and SO4 fluid composition, although CO2 and SO4 may have alternate sources. Select geothermometers calculated reservoir temperatures of up to 283 °C for central deep wells and as low as 30 °C and 5 °C for hot springs and cold springs, respectively. Like many high-temperature geothermal systems, the compositions of thermal fluids appeared to be controlled by the equilibrium between the fluid and observed secondary minerals. Hot springs and wells on the eastern and northern sides of the reservoir are of low temperature and likely define the boundaries of peripheral waters. Wells to the southeast contained anomalously high Cl and SO4, suggesting a possible magmatic input of these components which may be controlled by the east-west running Meager Creek Fault Zone. There is a significant source of hot, Cl- and CO2-rich thermal waters supplying deep wells MC-1, MC-2, MC-6 and MC-8, and possibly MC-3. These NaCl waters likely define the high temperature, central location of the geothermal reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it