MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963195423 · doi:10.32873/unl.dc.tsasp.0054

Warp and weft twining, and tablet weaving around the Pacific

2019· article· en· W2963195423 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tomoko Torimaru, Kathryn Rousso, Laura Filloy, Alejandro de Ávila B

Bibliographic record

VenueTextile Society of America Symposium Proceedings · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeavingLOOMSubsistence agricultureFishingArchaeologyGeographyArchaeological recordVisual artsArtFisheryEngineeringAgricultureMechanical engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warp and weft twining predates loom-woven textiles in the archaeological record. Although it was displaced by other techniques to produce fabric in areas where it is recorded from early times, such as Egypt, this particular approach to building woven structures is still maintained in scattered areas around the world as part of local traditions with deep significance in ritual and festive life, as well in the heavy subsistence work of agricultural and hunting/fishing communities. In this roundtable, we propose to describe, illustrate and compare warp and weft twined, and tablet woven textiles from Central America, Mexico, Canada, Alaska, China, Myanmar and Central Asia. We will draw on the expertise of scholars who have done ethnographic and archaeological field work in these regions surrounding the Pacific. Furthermore, the participants in the roundtable have experience recreating the various techniques they will discuss, both as textile and basketry artists, and as conservation specialists. Warp twining is found on the sturdiest tumplines and cinches for pack animals, made with bast fibers, as well as on the finest ribbons for ceremonial use made with silk, inscribed with ritual texts or delicate patterns. This versatility will be a central topic of discussion during the roundtable, along with the flexibility that these techniques (including weft twining) provide for creating curvilinear patterns that allow exquisite script and traditional designs to be transferred from paper to fabric. Disjunct geographical distributions, such as the spotty occurrence of warp twined textiles worldwide, have been conventionally viewed as “relictual” phenomena that bespeak the cultural conservatism of physically or socially isolated peoples. In this roundtable we will take a different approach, looking at these specific techniques as achievements of human ingenuity that may well have been developed independently, and should enrich the repertoire of contemporary textile artists globally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTextile Society of America Symposium ProceedingsSame topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207