MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963338268 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1907699116

Exposing the inadequacy of redox formalisms by resolving redox inequivalence within isovalent clusters

2019· article· en· W2963338268 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amymarie K. Bartholomew, Justin J. Teesdale, Raúl Hernández Sánchez, Brian J. Malbrecht, Cristin E. Juda, Gabriel Ménard, Wei Bu, Diana A. Iovan, Alexandre A. Mikhailine, Shao‐Liang Zheng, Ritimukta Sarangi, SuYin Grass Wang, Yu‐Sheng Chen, Theodore A. Betley

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryNational Institute of General Medical SciencesBiological and Environmental ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOffice of ScienceNational Institutes of HealthNational Science FoundationConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaDivision of ChemistryCamille and Henry Dreyfus FoundationArgonne National LaboratoryU.S. Department of EnergyHarvard University
KeywordsDelocalized electronRedoxChemistryCrystallographyMössbauer spectroscopyAnomalous scatteringCluster (spacecraft)Coordination sphereAtom (system on chip)MetalOxidation stateScatteringCrystal structureInorganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this report we examine a family of trinuclear iron complexes by multiple-wavelength, anomalous diffraction (MAD) to explore the redox load distribution within cluster materials by the free refinement of atomic scattering factors. Several effects were explored that can impact atomic scattering factors within clusters, including 1) metal atom primary coordination sphere, 2) M−M bonding, and 3) redox delocalization in formally mixed-valent species. Complexes were investigated which vary from highly symmetric to fully asymmetric by 57 Fe Mössbauer and X-ray diffraction to explore the relationship between MAD-derived data and the data available from these widely used characterization techniques. The compounds examined include the all-ferrous clusters [ n Bu 4 N][( tbs L)Fe 3 (μ 3 –Cl)] (1) ([ tbs L] 6– = [1,3,5-C 6 H 9 (NC 6 H 4 - o -NSi t BuMe 2 ) 3 ] 6– ]), ( tbs L)Fe 3 (py) (2), [K(C 222 )] 2 [( tbs L)Fe 3 (μ 3 –NPh)] (4) (C 222 = 2,2,2-cryptand), and the mixed-valent ( tbs L)Fe 3 (μ 3 –NPh) (3). Redox delocalization in mixed-valent 3 was explored with cyclic voltammetry (CV), zero-field 57 Fe Mössbauer, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray crystallography techniques. We find that the MAD results show an excellent correspondence to 57 Fe Mössbauer data; yet also can distinguish between subtle changes in local coordination geometries where Mössbauer cannot. Differences within aggregate oxidation levels are evident by systematic shifts of scattering factor envelopes to increasingly higher energies. However, distinguishing local oxidation levels in iso- or mixed-valent materials can be dramatically obscured by the degree of covalent intracore bonding. MAD-derived atomic scattering factor data emphasize in-edge features that are often difficult to analyze by X-ray absorption near edge spectroscopy (XANES). Thus, relative oxidation levels within the cluster were most reliably ascertained from comparing the entire envelope of the atomic scattering factor data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.517

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207