An Examination of the Relationship Between Strength and Speed in Elementary School Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study intends to examine the relationship between strength and speed in Cumhuriyet Elementary School in Samsun. The study group consists of 240 students (120 boys and 120 girls) aged 11–14 years who participated voluntarily in the study through random selection. This study investigated the relationship among the values of leg and back strength, 30-second sit-up, standing long jump, vertical jump, reaction time, and 10 m and 20 m sprint running of 5th through 8th graders. Intragroup strength and speed relationships of each class and gender were examined separately in the study. Data were analyzed through Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient in SPSS package program with a .05 margin of error (p < .05). As a result of the study, it was observed that the strength and speed increased in conjunction with the age variable and there was a significant negative correlation between 10 m and 20 m sprint running and strength values. That is, the sprint running time decreased as the strength increased. According to the results obtained in the study, it was seen that there was a significant relationship between strength and speed in school children aged 11–14 years and that speed and strength performances affected each other. However, no significant linear relationship was found between reaction time and strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".