MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963411158 · doi:10.2514/1.j058026

Surface-Pressure-Based Estimation of the Velocity Field in a Separation Bubble

2019· article· en· W2963411158 on OpenAlexafffund
Burak Ahmet Tuna, John W. Kurelek, Serhiy Yarusevych

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBubbleAirfoilTurbulenceSeparation (statistics)MechanicsReynolds numberLaminar flowRandomnessFlow separationMathematicsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effectiveness in estimating the velocity field in a laminar separation bubble using surface-pressure-based stochastic estimation methods is examined. A separation bubble is formed over a NACA 0018 airfoil at a Reynolds number of 125,000 and an angle of attack of 4°, while the velocity field and surface pressure fluctuations are measured simultaneously. Single-time-delay and multi-time-delay estimation techniques, in both single-point and multipoint formulations, are employed and compared, showing that the accuracy of the estimates increases notably through the inclusions of additional predictor events in both space and time. The multipoint, multi-time-delay estimation technique is shown to produce the most accurate estimates, with the reconstructed velocity fields capturing all essential flow features across the scales of interest. The accuracy of the estimates is shown to depend on location within the bubble, with the best results found in the region of the mean maximum bubble height, whereas performance decreases near the mean separation point. The latter is due to the transition to turbulence increasing the randomness of fluctuations and can be mitigated through more advanced stochastic estimation, whereas the former is a result of low disturbance amplitudes that fall within the noise level of the measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA JournalSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207