On Approximate Range Mode and Range Selection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For any $ε\in (0,1)$, a $(1+ε)$-approximate range mode query asks for the position of an element whose frequency in the query range is at most a factor $(1+ε)$ smaller than the true mode. For this problem, we design an $O(n/ε)$ bit data structure supporting queries in $O(\lg(1/ε))$ time. This is an encoding data structure which does not require access to the input sequence; we prove the space cost is asymptotically optimal for constant $ε$. Our solution improves the previous best result of Greve et al. (Cell Probe Lower Bounds and Approximations for Range Mode, ICALP'10) by reducing the space cost by a factor of $\lg n$ while achieving the same query time. We also design an $O(n)$-word dynamic data structure that answers queries in $O(\lg n /\lg\lg n)$ time and supports insertions and deletions in $O(\lg n)$ time, for any constant $ε\in (0,1)$. This is the first result on dynamic approximate range mode; it can also be used to obtain the first static data structure for approximate 3-sided range mode queries in two dimensions. We also consider approximate range selection. For any $α\in (0,1/2)$, an $α$-approximate range selection query asks for the position of an element whose rank in the query range is in $[k - αs, k + αs]$, where $k$ is a rank given by the query and $s$ is the size of the query range. When $α$ is a constant, we design an $O(n)$-bit encoding data structure that can answer queries in constant time and prove this space cost is asymptotically optimal. The previous best result by Krizanc et al. (Range Mode and Range Median Queries on Lists and Trees, Nordic Journal of Computing, 2005) uses $O(n\lg n)$ bits, or $O(n)$ words, to achieve constant approximation for range median only. Thus we not only improve the space cost, but also provide support for any arbitrary $k$ given at query time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".