An End-to-End Adaptive Input Selection With Dynamic Weights for Forecasting Multivariate Time Series
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multivariate time series forecasting is critical in many applications, such as signal processing, finance, air quality forecasting, and pattern recognition. In particular, determining the most relevant variables and proper lag length from multivariate time series is challenging. This paper proposes an end-to-end recurrent neural network framework equipped with an adaptive input selection mechanism to improve the prediction performance for multivariate time series forecasting. The proposed model, named AIS-RNN, consists of two main components: the first neural network learns to generate context-dependent importance weights to dynamically select the input. The selected input is then fed into the second module for predicting the target variable. The experimental results show that our proposed end-to-end approach outperforms machine learning-based baselines on several public benchmark datasets. The AIS-LSTM model achieves higher performance on a public M3 dataset than the M3-specialized models. Furthermore, the AIS-RNN gives a beneficial advantage to interpret variable importance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it