The Natural History of Scaphoid Fracture Malunion: A Scoping Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background A scaphoid malunion occurs when a scaphoid fracture heals in a nonanatomic position or when the fracture is fixed without correction of the sagittal angular deformity. Although altered carpal mechanics and early osteoarthritis have been suggested as natural sequelae, the natural history and clinical outcomes are debatable. Purposes The purpose of this study is to review and summarize the available literature regarding clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of patients with scaphoid malunion. Methods A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was performed to identify published studies concerning the clinical and radiological results of scaphoid malunion following either acute scaphoid fracture or surgically treated nonunions. Results Five publications with a total of 83 malunions were included in the final synthesis. The diagnosis of malunion was based on computed tomography by calculating the lateral intrascaphoid angle (threshold of 35 or 45 degrees) or height/length ratio (threshold of 0.6). Self-reported and clinical evaluation techniques varied between the studies and direct comparison was not possible between the different outcome measures. Most patients demonstrated arthritic changes; however, correlation with pain and functional results was not always present. Conclusions This scoping review confirmed that patients with malunited scaphoids seem to have higher likelihood of post traumatic arthritis. However, clinical implications remain uncertain and better methods for assessing and defining scaphoid deformity are required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.016 | 0.016 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".