MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963611417 · doi:10.1142/s0219199715500790

General weak limit for Kähler–Ricci flow

2015· article· en· W2963611417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research CouncilPeking UniversityCentre de Recherches Mathématiques
KeywordsRicci flowMathematicsGravitational singularitySingularityLimit (mathematics)UniquenessFlow (mathematics)Pure mathematicsManifold (fluid mechanics)Mathematical analysisKähler manifoldRicci curvatureCurrent (fluid)GeometryPhysicsCurvature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider the Kähler–Ricci flow with finite time singularities over any closed Kähler manifold. We prove the existence of the flow limit in the sense of current toward the time of singularity. This answers affirmatively a problem raised by Tian in [New results and problems on Kähler–Ricci flow, Astérisque 322 (2008) 71–92] on the uniqueness of the weak limit from sequential convergence construction. The notion of minimal singularity introduced by Demailly in the study of positive current comes up naturally. We also provide some discussion on the infinite time singularity case for comparison. The consideration can be applied to more flexible evolution equation of Kähler–Ricci flow type for any cohomology class. The study is related to general conjectures on the singularities of Kähler–Ricci flows.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.494
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.079 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it