MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963672692 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.5946

Management of urachal cancer: A review by the Canadian Urological Association and Genitourinary Medical Oncologists of Canada

2019· review· en· W2963672692 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreDalhousie UniversityUniversity of OttawaUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster University Medical CentreCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUmbilicus (mollusc)Bladder cancerGenitourinary systemDiseaseCancerGynecologyGeneral surgeryPathologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We performed a search of Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane using the following keywords: urachus cancer, urachus carcinoma, carcinoma of the urachus, cancer of the urachus, urachal cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.415
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it